on which point in particular? Didnt started anything yet (hopefully next week, for sure the one after)
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-28 13:22 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <[email protected]>: > Is there any update on this Romain? > > On 23/01/15 13:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> >> Guys do you think we can try to plan a release beginning of next months? >> >> I see: >> -> jms 2 api >> -> javamail (last 2 versions or too early for last one?) >> -> jta 1.2 api >> -> jaxrs 2 api >> -> ejb 3.2 api >> >> >> All in alpha excepted current javamail version >> >> wdyt? >> >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> 2015-01-15 16:35 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <[email protected]>: >>> >>> I'm honestly don't know much about this either. An alpha-1 though would >>> suffice. >>> >>> Thanks gents >>> Martyn >>> >>> On 14/01/15 17:29, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>> >>>> AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others >>>> >>>> BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec >>>> batch release like last time? >>>> >>>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> @rmannibucau >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>> >>>> >>>> 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> Martyn, >>>>> >>>>> Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd >>>>> prefer >>>>> if >>>>> possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see >>>>> a >>>>> release. >>>>> >>>>> John >>>>> >>>>> On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo. >>>>>> >>>>>> One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS >>>>>> 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss >>>>>> JMS >>>>>> 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of >>>>>> the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6 >>>>>> test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation >>>>>> with >>>>>> this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to >>>>>> utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP >>>>>> clearance, >>>>>> allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release. >>>>>> >>>>>> If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me >>>>>> know. >>>>>> >>>>>> Kind regards >>>>>> Martyn >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2 >>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6 >>>>>> >
