no blocker in my side excepted time so that's why I target the ~10th
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-28 13:58 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <[email protected]>: > I was just wondering if the beginning of next month is still likely for an > alpha release. > > On 28/01/15 12:23, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> >> on which point in particular? Didnt started anything yet (hopefully >> next week, for sure the one after) >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> 2015-01-28 13:22 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Is there any update on this Romain? >>> >>> On 23/01/15 13:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>> >>>> Guys do you think we can try to plan a release beginning of next months? >>>> >>>> I see: >>>> -> jms 2 api >>>> -> javamail (last 2 versions or too early for last one?) >>>> -> jta 1.2 api >>>> -> jaxrs 2 api >>>> -> ejb 3.2 api >>>> >>>> >>>> All in alpha excepted current javamail version >>>> >>>> wdyt? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> @rmannibucau >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>> >>>> >>>> 2015-01-15 16:35 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> I'm honestly don't know much about this either. An alpha-1 though >>>>> would >>>>> suffice. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks gents >>>>> Martyn >>>>> >>>>> On 14/01/15 17:29, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec >>>>>> batch release like last time? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>> @rmannibucau >>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Martyn, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd >>>>>>> prefer >>>>>>> if >>>>>>> possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to >>>>>>> see >>>>>>> a >>>>>>> release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> John >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new >>>>>>>> JMS >>>>>>>> 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss >>>>>>>> JMS >>>>>>>> 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6 >>>>>>>> test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>> this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to >>>>>>>> utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP >>>>>>>> clearance, >>>>>>>> allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let >>>>>>>> me >>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kind regards >>>>>>>> Martyn >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2 >>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6 >>>>>>>> >
