On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I was under the impression that sca.tld [1] was comming from SCA > specification. In this case, should it have the Apache License header > on it ? > > [1] > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/java/sca/modules/host-webapp/src/main/resources/META-INF/sca.tld > > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk > http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > Good point, it comes substantially (there are some Tuscany specific parts of if) from the OSOA JEE Integration Specification so it should have the attributions and license associated with it as defined in the specification. sca.tld is not one of the artifacts available from http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0/ so I expect we need to treat it as a portion of the spec that has been copied. The license in the specification [1] doesn't give specific permission to construct derviative works of the specification so this gives us a problem w.r.t the changes that we need to make. In lieu of immediate changes to the specification this would be easier if sca.tld were made available at http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0/. Thoughts? As an aside is the addition of <rtexprval> something we should raise with OASIS or is it specific to our implementation? Regards Simon [1] http://www.osoa.org/download/attachments/35/SCA_JAVAEE_Integration_V100.pdf?version=1
