On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >> >>> I was under the impression that sca.tld [1] was comming from SCA >>> specification. In this case, should it have the Apache License header >>> on it ? >>> >>> [1] >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/java/sca/modules/host-webapp/src/main/resources/META-INF/sca.tld >>> >>> -- >>> Luciano Resende >>> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk >>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende<http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> >>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >>> >> >> Good point, it comes substantially (there are some Tuscany specific parts >> of if) from the OSOA JEE Integration Specification so it should have the >> attributions and license associated with it as defined in the specification. >> sca.tld is not one of the artifacts available from >> http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0/ so I expect we need to treat it as a >> portion of the spec that has been copied. >> >> The license in the specification [1] doesn't give specific permission to >> construct derviative works of the specification so this gives us a problem >> w.r.t the changes that we need to make. In lieu of immediate changes to the >> specification this would be easier if sca.tld were made available at >> http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0/. Thoughts? >> >> As an aside is the addition of <rtexprval> something we should raise with >> OASIS or is it specific to our implementation? >> >> Regards >> >> Simon >> >> [1] >> http://www.osoa.org/download/attachments/35/SCA_JAVAEE_Integration_V100.pdf?version=1 >> > > I've raised TUSCANY-2620 to fix this for 1.3.2. I think the derivation > point is not so problematic as this particular part of the spec is marked, > in places, indicating that implementation specific aspects will be present. > I'll go ahead and change the license to the OSOA spec license. Going forward > we do need to decide what to do about <rtexprval> w.r.t the OASIS > specifications. > > Simon > As Raymond pointed out in [2], it appears sca.tld is not compliant with web-jsptaglibrary_2_1.xsd. I will raise an issue with OASIS SCA-J-JEE Subcommittee. ++Vamsi [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01952.html
