On Sep 29, 2008, at 3:55 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
I was under the impression that sca.tld [1] was comming from SCA
specification. In this case, should it have the Apache License header
on it ?
[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/java/sca/modules/host-webapp/src/main/resources/META-INF/sca.tld
AIUI it is ok and appropriate to have this using the Apache license.
Its a similar case to as when we have the spec defined Java
interfaces, eg [1] or [2].
IANAL...
I'll dig out the old discussions of the geronimo spec licensing... In
general, IIUC, unless you are the copyright holder of the material,
you can't relicense the material... It seems to me that those OSOA
files should be covered by an OSOA license, not AL v2.
--kevan
