On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:35 PM, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Dave, >>>> >>>> Can any of your tests be contributed to Tuscany functional test suite so >>>> that it can be run on a regular basis? >>>> >>>> Haleh >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Dave Sowerby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey Simon, >>>>> >>>>> We've got a suite of tests that we can run against a maven repository >>>>> to test a number of scenarios, so the sooner the better, but obviously >>>>> if RC1 isn't far away then I guess we can wait for that! >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Dave. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Simon Laws < >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Dave Sowerby < >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Hey guys, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Should we expect a maven distribution for this, or will that only be >>>>> >> present in RC1? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Cheers, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Dave. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> -- >>>>> >> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Simon Laws < >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> >> wrote: >>>>> >> > I've put the basic distribution artifacts and the rat file for >>>>> 1.3.2 up >>>>> >> > here >>>>> >> > (http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/>). >>>>> No maven artifacts >>>>> >> > yet. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > As I was doing it I noticed some problems with the RAT file (It >>>>> looks >>>>> >> > like a >>>>> >> > couple of files have crept in without Apache headers) so we're >>>>> going to >>>>> >> > have >>>>> >> > to do an RC1 but I thought it would be useful to have people look >>>>> at >>>>> >> > this >>>>> >> > anyhow to see if everything is OK before we vote. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Can someone take a look at the RAT issues as I'm just off home. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Thanks >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Simon >>>>> >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi Dave >>>>> > >>>>> > I was going to wait until RC1 but I could do one if it helps. >>>>> > >>>>> > Simon >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> I've put some maven artifacts up for 1.3.2 RC0 for people to look at. >>> There still seems to be something strange about TUSCANY-2531 so it'll take a >>> little time to run that to ground. >>> >>> Simon >>> >> >> Ok, so I think we are pretty much don't with the issues that came out of >> RC0. I'm fixing up a license issues then I'll post an RC1 and start a vote. >> >> Thanks >> >> Simon >> > > I'm currently copying up the 1.3.2RC1 artifacts to > > http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC1/> > > Will be a few minutes until they are all there. Can people take a look and > satisfy themselves that it works as expected. I've fixed the license header > in sca.tld to be OSOA but ant has pointed out that there are others in > tuscany-sca-api that are ASL2. I'm happy to fix them but I only want to do > it once so can people comment on the active thread [1] either for or > otherwise. > > Simon > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40tuscany.apache.org/msg02683.html > I get "Forbidden" when i try to access the artifacts, could you twiddle the permissions? ...ant
