On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Dan Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I was able to build and run several samples (e.g. calculator-distributed).
> So no problems there.
>
> However, the Eclipse plugin appears to need updating. Although it installs
> and runs correctly, the name for the plugin appears at "Apache Tuscany SCA
> Tools 1.3.1".
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:35 PM, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Hi Dave,
>>>>>
>>>>> Can any of your tests be contributed to Tuscany functional test suite
>>>>> so
>>>>> that it can be run on a regular basis?
>>>>>
>>>>> Haleh
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Dave Sowerby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> >wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Hey Simon,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We've got a suite of tests that we can run against a maven repository
>>>>>> to test a number of scenarios, so the sooner the better, but obviously
>>>>>> if RC1 isn't far away then I guess we can wait for that!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Simon Laws <
>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Dave Sowerby <
>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Should we expect a maven distribution for this, or will that only be
>>>>>>>> present in RC1?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dave.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Simon Laws <
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've put the basic distribution artifacts and the rat file for
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1.3.2 up
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> here
>>>>>>>>> (http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/>
>>>>>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC0/>).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No maven artifacts
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As I was doing it I noticed some problems with the RAT file (It
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> looks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> like a
>>>>>>>>> couple of files have crept in without Apache headers) so we're
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> going to
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> to do an RC1 but I thought it would be useful to have people look
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> anyhow to see if everything is OK before we vote.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can someone take a look at the RAT issues as I'm just off home.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Simon
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Hi Dave
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was going to wait until RC1 but I could do one if it helps.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Simon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>  I've put some maven artifacts up for 1.3.2 RC0 for people to look at.
>>>> There still seems to be something strange about TUSCANY-2531 so it'll
>>>> take a
>>>> little time to run that to ground.
>>>>
>>>> Simon
>>>>
>>>>  Ok, so I think we are pretty much don't with the issues that came out
>>> of
>>> RC0. I'm fixing up a license issues then I'll post an RC1 and start a
>>> vote.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Simon
>>>
>>>
>> I'm currently copying up the 1.3.2RC1 artifacts to
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC1/>
>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3.2-RC1/>
>>
>> Will be a few minutes until they are all there. Can people take a look and
>> satisfy themselves that it works as expected. I've fixed the license
>> header
>> in sca.tld to be OSOA but ant has pointed out that there are others in
>> tuscany-sca-api that are ASL2. I'm happy to fix them but I only want to do
>> it once so can people comment on the active thread [1] either for or
>> otherwise.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40tuscany.apache.org/msg02683.html
>>
>>
>
> --
> Thanks, Dan Becker
>
ah - thanks Dan.  I'll take a look at that.

Simon

Reply via email to