Namaste Vikram,
I can't say anything about Agave as I never worked with it. I know
David Zülke and will meet him on friday over a few beers. Will ask him
about his opinion.
Nevertheless for me this isn't really a choice.
Why does OXID raise the question to port to ZF?
Not because of technical reasons. Simply because ZF is already
inudstry standard in PHP Area and will be even more important in the
future. Therefore many developer know ZF, are used to it, there is
much documentation available, exams and - to come to an end - this is
clearly the future for the majority of all PHP applications.
Don't forget that even OXID themselve did build up a certain amount of
ZF knowhow as efire is based on it.
That's the reason why it's wise to port to ZF. Speaking from technical
point of view - there is absolutly no reason to change anything. The
oxid framework itself is well grown over the years, robust and fast.
OXID users and partners know it already. Therefore I would never
support any other framework besides ZF.
Greetings to india,
d.
P.S. where are you based? mumbai?
Am 14.07.2009 um 08:14 schrieb Vikram Vaswani:
Hi Lars,
#5 it's a simple, easy to use framework and not some overweight
overbloated fat monster like e.g. cake or symphony
I would agree with you re: the above point. What is your opinion of
Agavi as a framework? It is not as loosely coupled as ZF but at the
same time, it is a very good MVC implementation and I believe offers
performance that is slightly better than symfony.
Vikram
_______________________________________________
dev-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general
_______________________________________________
dev-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general
