Lars Jankowfsky schrieb:
No. ZF is a component system like ez. You can use whatever component you want they are not coupled and integrated. In fact there are some components I would not suggest to be used (starting with Zend_Db and ending with Zend_Currency and Zend_Date) but the rest ist great.
I didn't know that the components of ZF are not coupled, i thought they are, because i only saw the usage of ZF as a whole framework and not as single modules. In that case, i revide my suggestion to use some of the eZ components. ;)
Magento is not slower than oxid because of the usage of ZF. It's the database layout. They use a normalized layout which - in fact - was also there in the oxid 0.1;) And this is exaclty the difference between oxid and magento - oxid has a lot of experience and learned which mistakes shouldnt be done. While magento has a few years to catch up in experience.
And to magento: yes, the database layout is one of the factors which make magento in some areas slower than oxid, but there are other factors, too.
Nevertheless there are quite fast installations of magento. They introduced some "caching" concept where the data is replicated into de-normalized tables and these shops are really fast.
Yes, i know that there are some fast magento installations. But for joe average, it seems slow at if you don't optimize it, it is slow.
And Magento is also the only software, where i encountered ZF. At work, i work with a library build up "from scratch".
_______________________________________________ dev-general mailing list [email protected] http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general
