24.10.04 at 19:51, Michael Heydekamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24.10.04:
>> 23.10.04 at 23:48, Michael Heydekamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> That's just what I said. But Joachim was saying that it would have >>> been "corrected" to "Lister" again (I didn't verify if he's really >>> correct). And that's exactly what I want to avoid: Reversing earlier >>> corrections just because we put ourselves under time pressure and >>> wanna be finished at a specific date. >> It's never a good idea to quote a release date or to set a time >> schedule because the folks who have to adhere to the schedule(s) are >> merely doing everything as a hobby and "real life" will always >> interfere. > ACK. Unfortunately there seem to be some difficulties in finding a > common position in this point with the rest of the gang. Hmmm, I wasn't aware of that but I'm sure common sense will prevail and common ground will be found. >>> It may even happen that the reversion of such "corrections" may be >>> overlooked by you or me when looking through a huge resource or help >>> file. That's the danger I'm seeing. >> Yes and having re-compiled the 3.21 sources just 10 minutes ago and >> having had a very quick look around, I've already spotted a number of >> things that need correcting. > Just to avoid misunderstandings: *Although* you are saying in another > posting that MW's changes are fine, right? Right. > It's just that a lot more changes need to be done, did I get that > right? Yes, absolutely. -- Martin +-----------------------------+ | FreeXP English Support Site | | http://www.freexp.co.uk | +-----------------------------+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ FreeXP Entwickler-Mailingliste [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.freexp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev-list
