Anne, Le 20 sept. 2014 à 18:20, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> a écrit : > Yeah the W3C crowd keeps saying that
Here the W3C crowd. We (Mozilla) have a conflict ;) http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=40318&public=1&order=org#_MozillaFoundation This apart, I would love to have this discussion during the work week in December. I think F2F removes a lot of the imaginary tensions conveyed by emails. :) You know me, I know you. I don't know that much Boris though apart online. Unfortunately. So discussions in December please. > The problem is that the W3C publishes something that is 500 commits > behind what they copied from and claims it's interoperable while the > test coverage is mediocre. Is the whatwg spec interoperable? Will it ever be? So I guess the answer will be "no". Which makes an interesting issue and it's why the discussion currently happening about the future of HTML is cool. Let's see http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/public-permissive-exit-criteria.html > Interoperable > > Qualitatively interoperable at at a judgment level, not necessarily for every > spec assertion. A test suite may be used as guidance for the qualitative > decision. Does it meet this criteria? If not on which sections it doesn't. Also there is a link about features at Risk. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/HTML5.0AtRiskFeatures Should they be removed? That doesn't help David Baron in his job as an AC rep though. > If there are comments you think Mozilla should send as part of the > review, or if you think Mozilla should voice support or opposition > to the specification, please say so in this thread. (I'd note, > however, that there have been many previous opportunities to make > comments, so it's somewhat bad form to bring up fundamental issues > for the first time at this stage.) So Boris said incomplete test suite. That's one comment. My take is that we should support its publication with a record of the parts we think didn't work and what we would love to see for the next generation of HTML and how it should be developed with us participating. -- Karl Dubost, Mozilla http://www.la-grange.net/karl/moz _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
