> > Both of these behaviours are incompatible with reviewer-initiated landing. >
I've fallen on both sides of this particular fence; sometimes I want to fire-and-forget a patch, and sometimes I still want to digest further after getting review (or I know a piece of work is incomplete and further parts will be forthcoming). Perhaps this needs an opt-in flag on the input side? "r?, and land it if you're happy" versus "r?, but I'll take care of landing"? _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
