On May 21, 2016 9:44 AM, "Honza Bambas" <hbam...@mozilla.com> wrote: > If it's nsPipeInputStream then it's definitely alright. OTOH, we do copy the memory, right? I was somehow hoping that you just expose the IPC-allocated buffers via your own implementation of nsIInputStream, avoiding coping to an XPCOM pipe.
That would be nice, but no. IPC doesn't even support passing dependent strings as far as I know. This first iteration is just an actor like any other. I didn't change the IPC internals at all. Ben _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
