On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Ben Kelly <bke...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> > On May 21, 2016 9:44 AM, "Honza Bambas" <hbam...@mozilla.com> wrote: > > If it's nsPipeInputStream then it's definitely alright. OTOH, we do > copy the memory, right? I was somehow hoping that you just expose the > IPC-allocated buffers via your own implementation of nsIInputStream, > avoiding coping to an XPCOM pipe. > > That would be nice, but no. IPC doesn't even support passing dependent > strings as far as I know. > > This first iteration is just an actor like any other. I didn't change the > IPC internals at all. > Oh, I think understand better now. I wrote a bug to implement this idea in the future: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1274815 Ben _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
