On Thursday, 17 September 2015 09:27:15 UTC+10, [email protected] wrote: > MITM is *always* bad and breaks the web. Modern browsers, especially > Firefox, have great features to protect the users and this is something > good. I'm pretty sure your students don't even know, that you attack > their connection to the Internet. > You may have no influence on the decision why you have to do this > (mostly because of surveillance and censorship), but this a political > discussion and there are many issues on this topic. I have no wish to > comment this further.
Yes, thanks, sjw, I understand that, and suspect we might probably agree on some of _those_ issues you hint at, but that's not the issue I'm raising here. Of course, I'm not disputing Firefox should defeat MITM (!) but I'm comparing how, apparently, easily and reliably, from an _administration_ point of view, Chrome does that - leading to the extinction of Firefox from enterprise. I'm not pretending to be able to take the planning and management of this away from you guys. You are clearly authoritative. But I am wondering - have you evaluated the threat? I'm just saying - it looks like there may be a problem out there, and it could be a big one - actual operational continuity. What's the vision for Firefox? Lead browser or niche player? Have you evaluted the threat? _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
