On Thursday, 17 September 2015 10:11:06 UTC+10, Daniel Micay wrote: > Chrome has pinning too . . . I don't think lack of support > for MITM attacks is a bug that should be addressed. It's a security > liability even when used internally by an organization.
Thanks for your contribution, Daniel. I recognise that I don't fully understand the significance of everything you've said, but because it's not that clear from my original post, I just wanted to comment that this request is not really about fixing my firefox. My main concern here is to check with or raise with the Mozilla management - have you evaluated how hard it is to use Firefox in some situations probably due to particular ways or implementations of security management in Firefox? This is really big picture here: I've looked up and suddenly seen Firefox market share trajectory looking like we need some steering input fast. This is a 3 to 6 year picture of decline so it will take as long to correct. There are circumstantial indicators that could imply particular handling of security is the most significant easily fixable cause (of the market share decline). That's what I'm raising. I'm beginning to feel like no-one's noticed this question yet. Is there anyone on this thread who can understand what I'm saying? Is there a better group to take this to? mozilla.strategy? I thought security.policy would be strategy central on security choices and how implementations impact users? _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
