Percy, As I suggested in the other thread, this does not seem a productive or fruitful line of inquiry, nor does it seem relevant to the issue at hand, nor does it seem to be done respectfully.
That is, the extent of the country of origin of a CA is not itself a fundamental issue of trust, nor should translation errors be. I agree that there's a line where elements such as actively misleading the public become a matter of public concern, but let's try not to suggest there is something wrong with being from a particular country, nor that it represents proof of wrongdoing. I believe we are on the cusp of crossing a line here, and would love if we could focus on the technical and factual issues, without attempting to imply fundamental guilt by association or pseudo-phrenological analysis of speech patterns to show some form of wrongdoing. _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
