Hi Eddy, On 04/09/16 09:51, Eddy Nigg wrote: > On 09/03/2016 11:02 PM, Percy wrote: >> I agree completely that we shouldn't imply fundamental guilt by >> association. However, WoSign threatened legal actions against Itzhak >> Daniel's disclosure compiled purely from public sources. I just want to >> make sure the disclosure was not buried after the content was taken down. > > I don't want to extend this discussion unnecessarily, but as a side note > you don't know which agreements this employee has signed with StartCom > and/or WoSign and hence you can't make a judgement on it either. Lets > leave this to the professionals dealing with it.
If he has signed an agreement with StartCom and/or WoSign which prevents him from pointing out, after leaving employment, facts which are in the public domain, then I suggest that those clauses in the agreement are an unconscionable[0] restriction on his freedoms and you should not be enforcing them. > (Of course your copying and distributing of the content originally > published by him can be also used against him, just some food for > thought) If something in what he has said is confidential, please point it out to me (by private email if you prefer) and I will adjust my attitude to that particular piece of information. Gerv [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unconscionability _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
