Who determines whether or not the PSL is accurate? Does common sense ever override the explicitly stated will of the TLD operator?
(BTW, just to be clear: I wasn't alleging, or even speculating, that the certs containing dNSNames for these public suffices were necessarily misissued. I only wanted to point out that they weren't on the list of base domains (PSL+1) that I generated) On 26/09/16 12:14, Gervase Markham wrote: > On 26/09/16 11:14, Rob Stradling wrote: >> ICANN: kuzbass.ru > > There are several .ru in your list; we should check whether the PSL is > actually accurate. I think they opened up a lot of previously-reserved > domains a while back, but it's hard to find the right records. > > These are the non-RU entries: > >> ICANN: gouv.ci >> ICANN: gov.sc > > Not a silly idea that governments may want certs for these, but neither > site is using such a cert. > >> ICANN: net.tj > > Redirects to com.tj, with a quote - domain speculator, PSL error? > >> ICANN: uem.mz > > A university in Mexico - PSL error? -- Rob Stradling Senior Research & Development Scientist COMODO - Creating Trust Online _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
