On Wednesday, 11 January 2017 18:31:32 UTC, Ryan Sleevi wrote: > Because you're not required to setup the webserver for > smtp.example.com.
Ah yes, silly me > I'm not saying they'd be right in arguing so I suppose that from a husbanding of resources point of view it makes sense to wait and see what happens to the remnants of ballot 169 before Mozilla jumps up and down about this. _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
