> Also -moz features, such as -moz-element, even if - security relevant.
We don't want to add more of these. If we were to, they would either be something being used internally in XUL (unlikely for this feature), or features that are on track to standardization. Though I don't think we create new -moz prefixes anymore, and instead pref-gate things. As far as I can tell the only way to get this feature in is to get it specced with tentative approval from a standards body. -Manish Goregaokar On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:30 PM, Dan Zulla <[email protected]> wrote: > Messaged to the list. Needs approval. Would like to continue here with > Firefox anyways. Maybe you know someone who has written significant > portions of code of CSS3 animations? > > I like Mozilla style and what has been accomplished. Also -moz features, > such as -moz-element, even if - security relevant. > > I was close to extracting Pixels. > > > > > Am 10. März 2017 um 06:48 schrieb Daniel Holbert <[email protected]>: > > On 03/09/2017 09:43 PM, Dan Zulla wrote: > Add CSS3 random() before like June? > > Still not clear. You want to "add" it... > - as a polyfill/demo-JS-implementation? That's up to you & whoever else > you can get interested in helping. :) > > - ...as a CSS feature specced by the CSSWG? You'd want to propose it on > the working group mailing list, which is: > [email protected] > Archives at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/ > > ~Daniel > _______________________________________________ > dev-tech-layout mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout > _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
