You misinterpreted my email, and you're simply wrong. I said "Can you be of any 
use" as in: Can you be of any use to get the thread going on the W3C list, which I 
have referenced before, after Daniel Holbert recommended it.

Also, Firefox is a place where such proposals become browsers features, when 
somebody starts to implement them. Which I can do, if I start to modify a whole 
bunch of CPP and .h files, which I have done.

Why, exactly, "Jet" (I-hope-you're-not-receiving-a-salary-from-Mozilla) do you 
think my proposal is not going to advance as a Web standard. Do you have a supervisor or 
manager at Mozilla, or something?

Dan Zulla. 

Am 26. März 2017 um 19:59 schrieb Jet Villegas <[email protected]>:

Dan:

You've received plenty of feedback that your proposal isn't likely to advance 
as a Web standard, and Firefox isn't where such proposals become browser 
features.

If you're not able to participate in a respectful manner, you'll need to move 
along.

--Jet

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:50 Dan Zulla <[email protected]> wrote:
No progress on W3C list. Can you be of any use?

Dan

Am 11. März 2017 um 20:58 schrieb Manish Goregaokar <[email protected]>:

Maybe it is, but that's very off topic for this list.

-Manish Goregaokar

On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Dan Zulla <[email protected]> wrote:
I understand that, yet, disregarding the dust - and with dust, I mean oldness - 
currently happening on web standards and current browser --

We haven't quite reached a level of low-to-high bandwidth streaming 
anything-onto-any device mobile/desktop 3G/Fiber/Any Bandwidth GPU rendered 
quality web/3D gaming/etc. stuff over the Web yet. Sure, WebGL/3D 
Canvas/ThreeJS exists, but...

Relevant features such as background-transparency for things like filter() and 
things like random(), along with other things, seem increasingly hard to 
implement, along with lengthy discussion such as this one, and C++ stuff seems 
increasingly hard to modify/extend/ask questions about without getting on 
mailing lists.

Mozilla financially supported scholarships and venture capital / seed funding / 
project funding budgets seem like zero to non-existent, and stuff - everything 
- is slow-to-boringly non existent..

Maybe time for a change of course at Mozilla? And with change-of-course I mean 
an entirely new web browsing experience and approach, very different from 
anything near to HTTP, HTML, CSS and Javascript. 

Dan





Am 11. März 2017 um 18:47 schrieb Manish Goregaokar <[email protected]>:

Also -moz features, such as -moz-element, even if - security relevant.

We don't want to add more of these. If we were to, they would either be 
something being used internally in XUL (unlikely for this feature), or features 
that are on track to standardization. Though I don't think we create new -moz 
prefixes anymore, and instead pref-gate things.

As far as I can tell the only way to get this feature in is to get it specced 
with tentative approval from a standards body.

-Manish Goregaokar

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:30 PM, Dan Zulla <[email protected]> wrote:
Messaged to the list. Needs approval. Would like to continue here with Firefox 
anyways. Maybe you know someone who has written significant portions of code of 
CSS3 animations?

I like Mozilla style and what has been accomplished. Also -moz features, such 
as -moz-element, even if - security relevant.

I was close to extracting Pixels.




Am 10. März 2017 um 06:48 schrieb Daniel Holbert <[email protected]>:

On 03/09/2017 09:43 PM, Dan Zulla wrote:
Add CSS3 random() before like June?

Still not clear. You want to "add" it...
- as a polyfill/demo-JS-implementation? That's up to you & whoever else
you can get interested in helping. :)

- ...as a CSS feature specced by the CSSWG? You'd want to propose it on
the working group mailing list, which is:
[email protected]
Archives at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/

~Daniel
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-layout mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout


_______________________________________________
dev-tech-layout mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-layout mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout

Reply via email to