On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Dan Zulla <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can you be of any use to get the thread going on the W3C list, which I > have referenced before, after Daniel Holbert recommended it. > Note that I also warned: "I'm skeptical that you'll have much luck there" (at the CSSWG), and I laid out some reasons why your proposal doesn't currently seem compelling to us & probably won't be compelling to the CSSWG either (though the CSSWG is who you would need to convince if you really wanted to see this as a CSS feature): https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/mozilla.dev.tech.layout/appreciate$20that$20intention%7Csort:relevance/mozilla.dev.tech.layout/iyiCsTzS6qc/TfCA3YEAEQAJ Also, Firefox is a place where such proposals become browsers features, > when somebody starts to implement them. Which I can do, if I start to > modify a whole bunch of CPP and .h files, which I have done. > Firefox is open source, so of course you're welcome to experiment with adding features in your local checkout & your own builds. But Mozilla is under no obligation to accept patches (particularly for a nonstandard CSS feature) as part of mainline Firefox. And we're unlikely to do in this case, for the reasons that I already laid out in my message that I linked above. Why, exactly, "Jet" (I-hope-you're-not-receiving-a-salary-from-Mozilla) do > you think my proposal is not going to advance as a Web standard. Do you > have a supervisor or manager at Mozilla, or something? > This sort of tone is exactly what Jet was talking about, regarding participating respectfully. Please stop. ~Daniel _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
