Dan: You've received plenty of feedback that your proposal isn't likely to advance as a Web standard, and Firefox isn't where such proposals become browser features.
If you're not able to participate in a respectful manner, you'll need to move along. --Jet On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:50 Dan Zulla <[email protected]> wrote: > No progress on W3C list. Can you be of any use? > > Dan > > Am 11. März 2017 um 20:58 schrieb Manish Goregaokar <[email protected] > >: > > Maybe it is, but that's very off topic for this list. > > -Manish Goregaokar > > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Dan Zulla <[email protected]> wrote: > I understand that, yet, disregarding the dust - and with dust, I mean > oldness - currently happening on web standards and current browser -- > > We haven't quite reached a level of low-to-high bandwidth streaming > anything-onto-any device mobile/desktop 3G/Fiber/Any Bandwidth GPU rendered > quality web/3D gaming/etc. stuff over the Web yet. Sure, WebGL/3D > Canvas/ThreeJS exists, but... > > Relevant features such as background-transparency for things like filter() > and things like random(), along with other things, seem increasingly hard > to implement, along with lengthy discussion such as this one, and C++ stuff > seems increasingly hard to modify/extend/ask questions about without > getting on mailing lists. > > Mozilla financially supported scholarships and venture capital / seed > funding / project funding budgets seem like zero to non-existent, and stuff > - everything - is slow-to-boringly non existent.. > > Maybe time for a change of course at Mozilla? And with change-of-course I > mean an entirely new web browsing experience and approach, very different > from anything near to HTTP, HTML, CSS and Javascript. > > Dan > > > > > > Am 11. März 2017 um 18:47 schrieb Manish Goregaokar <[email protected] > >: > > > Also -moz features, such as -moz-element, even if - security relevant. > > We don't want to add more of these. If we were to, they would either be > something being used internally in XUL (unlikely for this feature), or > features that are on track to standardization. Though I don't think we > create new -moz prefixes anymore, and instead pref-gate things. > > As far as I can tell the only way to get this feature in is to get it > specced with tentative approval from a standards body. > > -Manish Goregaokar > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:30 PM, Dan Zulla <[email protected]> wrote: > Messaged to the list. Needs approval. Would like to continue here with > Firefox anyways. Maybe you know someone who has written significant > portions of code of CSS3 animations? > > I like Mozilla style and what has been accomplished. Also -moz features, > such as -moz-element, even if - security relevant. > > I was close to extracting Pixels. > > > > > Am 10. März 2017 um 06:48 schrieb Daniel Holbert <[email protected]>: > > On 03/09/2017 09:43 PM, Dan Zulla wrote: > Add CSS3 random() before like June? > > Still not clear. You want to "add" it... > - as a polyfill/demo-JS-implementation? That's up to you & whoever else > you can get interested in helping. :) > > - ...as a CSS feature specced by the CSSWG? You'd want to propose it on > the working group mailing list, which is: > [email protected] > Archives at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/ > > ~Daniel > _______________________________________________ > dev-tech-layout mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-tech-layout mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout > _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
