On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote:
> I had put out a question a couple of different times in IRC about this, > actually. > > I originally had it broken down into 1.5.1 changes, with 1.5.0 changes > listed below. Others (I don't remember who) didn't care for this approach > so I lumped all of the 1.5.x changes together in one block. > Why? What was the rationale for doing this? > > Obviously this is something that needs to be discussed as a group because > we don't have consensus on what's expected. > > > On 2/19/14, 9:02 AM, Keith Turner wrote: > >> This changes files does not seem very useful. It lumps all of the 1.5.0 >> and 1.5.1 issues together. Compare this with 1.4.4 changes file which >> has >> a section for each 1.4.X release : >> >
