As of yesterday, JIRA has been re-indexed[1], so I think searches should be working more correctly now.
https://twitter.com/infrabot/statuses/436062268527501312 On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > I just diff'ed what Jira generated and what I had (removing issues that > were duplicate/invalid/etc), I found two issues that Jira did not report > correctly. > > In talking with Keith, it looks like the Jira indices might be > corrupted/out-of-date? ACCUMULO-1626 and ACCUMULO-1630 are reliably not > appearing in any searches (when they previously did). > > https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRAKB/Issues+are+ > not+appearing+in+Issue+Navigator+search+or+Dashboards > > > On 2/19/14, 4:46 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The CHANGES file in 1.5.1-RC2 is only the changes in 1.5.1 >>> >> >> >> So the diff[1] on which all of this discussion was based is the RC1 diff >> for CHANGES. In another thread we learned that the CHANGES files was not >> generated via Jira. I sorted the file generated by jira and the file from >> RC2 and they have differences. I have not looked at all cases, but one >> was >> odd. ACCUMULO-1626 is not in the jira generated release notes but is in >> the Josh generated ones?????????? That issue is marked for 1.5.1. I give >> up for now :) >> >> [1] : >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=commitdiff;h= >> d277321d176b71753d391f896f09dc9785173cb0 >> >> <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=commitdiff;h= >> d277321d176b71753d391f896f09dc9785173cb0> >> >> >> >>> >>> On 2/19/14, 3:47 PM, Christopher wrote: >>> >>> If, on the other hand, I'm >>>> misunderstanding, and this list is 1.5.1 only, and not a mix, then my >>>> -1 can change to a +1, because I don't have a preference to include >>>> 1.5.0 changes or not... only that they not be mixed confusingly. >>>> >>>> >>> >>
