I don't 100% recall (although I could probably dig through IRC logs).
Christopher initially told me "we've previously just included the
changes for that release, not recorded a history of previous releases".
I believe he recommended that the CHANGES file shouldn't even include
1.5.0 changes (although he did say that he doesn't care for the CHANGES
file at all).
a27f60b2 can likely be reverted and this will bring back the 1.5.0
changes beneath the 1.5.1 changes. This is what I would prefer, tbh, but
we have nothing firm.
On 2/19/14, 10:02 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote:
I had put out a question a couple of different times in IRC about this,
actually.
I originally had it broken down into 1.5.1 changes, with 1.5.0 changes
listed below. Others (I don't remember who) didn't care for this approach
so I lumped all of the 1.5.x changes together in one block.
Why? What was the rationale for doing this?
I would also like to hear rationale. ATM I'm inclined to -1
