+1 Thanks for doing this Josh. On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things down > to a specific set of jobs. > > I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to > notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT jobs > from apache jenkins. > > > Mike Drob wrote: > >> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm not >> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and >> sending an email. >> >> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns? >> >> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime. A >> real >> mensch! >> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be >>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service >>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some >>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists. >>> >>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ] >>> >>> -- >>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right now. >>>> >>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control over >>>> >>> a >>> >>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to the >>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be >>>> >>> responsive -- >>> >>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to call >>>> me >>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think I've >>>> >>> been >>> >>>> given WRT Accumulo. >>>> >>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at these >>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to >>>> /dev/null, >>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find time. >>>> >>>> >>>> Christopher wrote: >>>> >>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS >>>>> certificate store for my system). >>>>> >>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just speculating >>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would want >>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the email >>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary. >>>>> >>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions would >>>>> still be added value on its own, though. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> >>>>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6- >>> Integration-Tests/325/ >>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo- >>> Master-Integration-Tests/272/ >>> >>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as >>>>>> trusted >>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be >>>>>> trusted >>>>>> by default in FF. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Elser wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that was >>>>>>> >>>>>> run. >>> >>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do you >>>>>>> >>>>>> think >>> >>>> you would need to configure? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Christopher wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the >>>>>>>> test >>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own. >>>>>>>>> I've been >>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> been >>> >>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> run >>> >>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on >>>>>>>>> it), >>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests >>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> emails >>> >>>> to be >>>>>>>>> sent to the [email protected] list instead of just >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> to >>> >>>> myself. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> -- Sean
