I've added the address to the allow list for notifications. There appears to be some secondary check that prevents the mail from getting through since it's not from apache.org. I don't know if there is another whitelist beyond the allow list that moderators can control.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > So, I don't think you'd have to use your ASF password unless you > wanted to send using the ASF SMTP. That may not be necessary, unless > the mailing lists check the origin to prevent spam, or something > (would probably need to check with INFRA for info on that). The "From" > line is not actually part of the SMTP protocol itself, so you should > be able to just tell Jenkins to use anything. If there is a check in > place, I *think* all you'd really need to do is subscribe to the list > with the email address you wish to use, and ensure that the MX record > is properly set up for your domain. > > Best thing to do is probably to create an INFRA ticket explaining what > you're trying to do (with the from address you want to use and host > you are trying to send from) and see if they can just whitelist the > address. > > FWIW, I did see your test message from [email protected] to the > notifcations list... > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > > I do not want to configure my server to do that, as it would require me > to > > share my ASF password there. I haven't spent enough time to convince > myself > > that it's secure enough to do that. > > > > If you can find why exactly it isn't working (I can't even mail from > > [email protected]), I'm all ears. I've just spent too much time already > (in > > addition to wasting some of Billie's) to continue trying to figure out > why. > > > > > > Christopher wrote: > >> > >> I'm not a fan of putting it on the dev@ list. There must be a way to > >> add the email to a whitelist. Or... can you configure Jenkins to just > >> send as your from address as [email protected]? > >> > >> -- > >> Christopher L Tubbs II > >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've > lost > >>> interest in trying to make it work any further. > >>> > >>> Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list > >>> ([email protected]) > >>> instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use filters > of > >>> some > >>> form to move things around anyways. > >>> > >>> LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it > >>> would > >>> increase the traffic here dramatically. > >>> > >>> > >>> Josh Elser wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get > >>>> ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed through > >>>> normal means). > >>>> > >>>> We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this week. > >>>> Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually. > >>>> > >>>> Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test > failures > >>>> on master! > >>>> > >>>> (big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers) > >>>> > >>>> Josh Elser wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Frak. > >>>>> > >>>>> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send > from > >>>>> my server... > >>>>> > >>>>> Josh Elser wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before<enter> was hit. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the > Accumulo > >>>>>> jobs and I can add an account for you. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials > >>>>>> since > >>>>>> you brought up this discussion. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Josh Elser wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit > things > >>>>>>> down to a specific set of jobs. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to > >>>>>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal > UT > >>>>>>> jobs from apache jenkins. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Mike Drob wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and > I'm > >>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing > and > >>>>>>>> sending an email. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your > concerns? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own > dime. > >>>>>>>> A > >>>>>>>> real > >>>>>>>> mensch! > >>>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd > be > >>>>>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service > >>>>>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some > >>>>>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ] > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II > >>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected] > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results > >>>>>>>>>> right > >>>>>>>>>> now. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external > >>>>>>>>>> control > >>>>>>>>>> over > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service > to > >>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> responsive -- > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome > to > >>>>>>>>>> call me > >>>>>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't > think > >>>>>>>>>> I've > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> been > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at > >>>>>>>>>> these > >>>>>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to > >>>>>>>>>> /dev/null, > >>>>>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find > >>>>>>>>>> time. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared > NSS > >>>>>>>>>>> certificate store for my system). > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just > >>>>>>>>>>> speculating > >>>>>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I > would > >>>>>>>>>>> want > >>>>>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the > >>>>>>>>>>> email > >>>>>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration > permissions > >>>>>>>>>>> would > >>>>>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II > >>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser< > [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/ > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/ > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL > certs > >>>>>>>>>>>> as > >>>>>>>>>>>> trusted > >>>>>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it > should > >>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>> trusted > >>>>>>>>>>>> by default in FF. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job > that > >>>>>>>>>>>>> was > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> run. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly > do > >>>>>>>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> think > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> test > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a > VPS I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now > and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> been > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> run > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed > tests > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail on > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it), > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring > the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> emails > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the [email protected] list > instead of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > > >
