Thank you for your perseverance. It will be very helpful to see regular build results from full ITs. *fingers crossed*
-- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, test email from jenkins as "me" went through. Just kicked off ITs for > 1.6 and master which should go to notifications. > > This has blown up to be so much more painful than necessary. Sheesh. > > > Josh Elser wrote: >> >> Weird, you did get my message? I thought it had bounced. Odd. >> >> I'll see what happens if I try to send with my apache.org. >> >> Christopher wrote: >>> >>> So, I don't think you'd have to use your ASF password unless you >>> wanted to send using the ASF SMTP. That may not be necessary, unless >>> the mailing lists check the origin to prevent spam, or something >>> (would probably need to check with INFRA for info on that). The "From" >>> line is not actually part of the SMTP protocol itself, so you should >>> be able to just tell Jenkins to use anything. If there is a check in >>> place, I *think* all you'd really need to do is subscribe to the list >>> with the email address you wish to use, and ensure that the MX record >>> is properly set up for your domain. >>> >>> Best thing to do is probably to create an INFRA ticket explaining what >>> you're trying to do (with the from address you want to use and host >>> you are trying to send from) and see if they can just whitelist the >>> address. >>> >>> FWIW, I did see your test message from [email protected] to the >>> notifcations list... >>> >>> -- >>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I do not want to configure my server to do that, as it would require >>>> me to >>>> share my ASF password there. I haven't spent enough time to convince >>>> myself >>>> that it's secure enough to do that. >>>> >>>> If you can find why exactly it isn't working (I can't even mail from >>>> [email protected]), I'm all ears. I've just spent too much time >>>> already (in >>>> addition to wasting some of Billie's) to continue trying to figure >>>> out why. >>>> >>>> >>>> Christopher wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm not a fan of putting it on the dev@ list. There must be a way to >>>>> add the email to a whitelist. Or... can you configure Jenkins to just >>>>> send as your from address as [email protected]? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've >>>>>> lost >>>>>> interest in trying to make it work any further. >>>>>> >>>>>> Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list >>>>>> ([email protected]) >>>>>> instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use >>>>>> filters of >>>>>> some >>>>>> form to move things around anyways. >>>>>> >>>>>> LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it >>>>>> would >>>>>> increase the traffic here dramatically. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Elser wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get >>>>>>> ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed >>>>>>> through >>>>>>> normal means). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this >>>>>>> week. >>>>>>> Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test >>>>>>> failures >>>>>>> on master! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Frak. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send >>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>> my server... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before<enter> was hit. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the >>>>>>>>> Accumulo >>>>>>>>> jobs and I can add an account for you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials >>>>>>>>> since >>>>>>>>> you brought up this discussion. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit >>>>>>>>>> things >>>>>>>>>> down to a specific set of jobs. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to >>>>>>>>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate >>>>>>>>>> normal UT >>>>>>>>>> jobs from apache jenkins. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mike Drob wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list >>>>>>>>>>> and I'm >>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build >>>>>>>>>>> failing and >>>>>>>>>>> sending an email. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your >>>>>>>>>>> concerns? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own >>>>>>>>>>> dime. >>>>>>>>>>> A >>>>>>>>>>> real >>>>>>>>>>> mensch! >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think >>>>>>>>>>>> it'd be >>>>>>>>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service >>>>>>>>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have >>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ] >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh >>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results >>>>>>>>>>>>> right >>>>>>>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external >>>>>>>>>>>>> control >>>>>>>>>>>>> over >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a >>>>>>>>>>>>> service to >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> responsive -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than >>>>>>>>>>>>> welcome to >>>>>>>>>>>>> call me >>>>>>>>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't >>>>>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> been >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be >>>>>>>>>>>>> looking at >>>>>>>>>>>>> these >>>>>>>>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to >>>>>>>>>>>>> /dev/null, >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I >>>>>>>>>>>>> find >>>>>>>>>>>>> time. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my >>>>>>>>>>>>>> shared NSS >>>>>>>>>>>>>> certificate store for my system). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just >>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculating >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> email >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration >>>>>>>>>>>>>> permissions >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trusted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trusted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by default in FF. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> run. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> view >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VPS I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ensuring the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the [email protected] list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >
