Ok, test email from jenkins as "me" went through. Just kicked off ITs
for 1.6 and master which should go to notifications.
This has blown up to be so much more painful than necessary. Sheesh.
Josh Elser wrote:
Weird, you did get my message? I thought it had bounced. Odd.
I'll see what happens if I try to send with my apache.org.
Christopher wrote:
So, I don't think you'd have to use your ASF password unless you
wanted to send using the ASF SMTP. That may not be necessary, unless
the mailing lists check the origin to prevent spam, or something
(would probably need to check with INFRA for info on that). The "From"
line is not actually part of the SMTP protocol itself, so you should
be able to just tell Jenkins to use anything. If there is a check in
place, I *think* all you'd really need to do is subscribe to the list
with the email address you wish to use, and ensure that the MX record
is properly set up for your domain.
Best thing to do is probably to create an INFRA ticket explaining what
you're trying to do (with the from address you want to use and host
you are trying to send from) and see if they can just whitelist the
address.
FWIW, I did see your test message from [email protected] to the
notifcations list...
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> wrote:
I do not want to configure my server to do that, as it would require
me to
share my ASF password there. I haven't spent enough time to convince
myself
that it's secure enough to do that.
If you can find why exactly it isn't working (I can't even mail from
[email protected]), I'm all ears. I've just spent too much time
already (in
addition to wasting some of Billie's) to continue trying to figure
out why.
Christopher wrote:
I'm not a fan of putting it on the dev@ list. There must be a way to
add the email to a whitelist. Or... can you configure Jenkins to just
send as your from address as [email protected]?
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]>
wrote:
So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've
lost
interest in trying to make it work any further.
Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list
([email protected])
instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use
filters of
some
form to move things around anyways.
LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it
would
increase the traffic here dramatically.
Josh Elser wrote:
Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get
ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed
through
normal means).
We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this
week.
Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually.
Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test
failures
on master!
(big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers)
Josh Elser wrote:
Frak.
Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send
from
my server...
Josh Elser wrote:
Ugh, brain didn't catch up before<enter> was hit.
Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the
Accumulo
jobs and I can add an account for you.
Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials
since
you brought up this discussion.
Josh Elser wrote:
Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit
things
down to a specific set of jobs.
I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate
normal UT
jobs from apache jenkins.
Mike Drob wrote:
If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list
and I'm
not
worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build
failing and
sending an email.
Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your
concerns?
Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own
dime.
A
real
mensch!
On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<[email protected]>
wrote:
I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think
it'd be
nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have
some
recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
[ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh
Elser<[email protected]>
wrote:
If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results
right
now.
I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external
control
over
a
system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a
service to
the
project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
responsive --
and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than
welcome to
call me
out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't
think
I've
been
given WRT Accumulo.
IMO, the real question here is are people going to be
looking at
these
results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
/dev/null,
it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I
find
time.
Christopher wrote:
Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my
shared NSS
certificate store for my system).
I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just
speculating
that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I
would
want
more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the
email
to the mailing list, if necessary.
Being able to view the results without configuration
permissions
would
still be added value on its own, though.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh
Elser<[email protected]>
wrote:
Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL
certs
as
trusted
(so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it
should
be
trusted
by default in FF.
Josh Elser wrote:
Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last
job that
was
run.
I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what
exactly do
you
think
you would need to configure?
Christopher wrote:
That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to
view
the
test
results and/or configure the jobs.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh
Elser<[email protected]>
wrote:
For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a
VPS I
own.
I've been
running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time
now and
it's
been
really nice to get these results. It has just enough
resources to
run
through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed
tests
fail on
it),
but personally it feels like a good baseline for
ensuring the
tests
are
runnable by anyone.
If others feel like they might get value from it, I can
set
up
emails
to be
sent to the [email protected] list
instead of
just
to
myself.
Thoughts/Opinions?
