Github user joshelser commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/25#issuecomment-91054685
> isn't that the purpose of a code review
Not trying to insinuate there was any ill-will, but this discussion has not
been centered around encouragement and has really derailed from the initial
changeset. If there is a technical reason why these changes are technically
insufficient, then by all means, let's get them addressed. Otherwise,
alternative implementations can be done as follow on work (to try to keep
Eugene coming back again).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
