Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/25#discussion_r28016992
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/client/mapred/AbstractInputFormat.java
---
@@ -384,7 +387,21 @@ public static InputTableConfig
getInputTableConfig(JobConf job, String tableName
protected abstract static class AbstractRecordReader<K,V> implements
RecordReader<K,V> {
protected long numKeysRead;
protected Iterator<Map.Entry<Key,Value>> scannerIterator;
- protected RangeInputSplit split;
+ protected
org.apache.accumulo.core.client.mapreduce.impl.AccumuloInputSplit split;
+ protected ScannerBase scannerBase;
+
+ /**
+ * Configures the iterators on a scanner for the given table name.
+ *
+ * @param job
+ * the Hadoop job configuration
+ * @param scanner
+ * the scanner for which to configure the iterators
+ * @param tableName
+ * the table name for which the scanner is configured
+ * @since 1.7.0
+ */
+ protected abstract void setupIterators(JobConf job, ScannerBase
scanner, String tableName, AccumuloInputSplit split);
--- End diff --
> Looking at code right now the only part that diverges is pulling out
default split if they're somehow unavailable in the split. This narrows the
interface, hopefully in an acceptable way?
@echeipesh I think your approach looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
