Hi Hiram, If that's possible, that would be great until I can confirm a final solution. I'm sure there is one, and I'd hate to hold up a migration that pretty much everyone else is in favor of.
Best, Jim On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Jim, > > If your still feeling hesitant, how about we exclude the NMS bits from > migrating to Git for now? Would that work for you? > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Jim Gomes <[email protected]> wrote: > > Of particular importance to how we do things, I found the following Q&A > > extremely helpful. In particular, this answer ( > > http://stackoverflow.com/a/4120179/444653) to the following question: > > > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4120001/what-is-the-git-equivalent-for-revision-number > > > > Our build process automatically generates build numbers by extracting > > revision numbers. This would be an important feature in order to > > potentially use git directly. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Jim Gomes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Hiram, > >> > >> While that particular tool wouldn't quite work for us, I did a little > more > >> digging, and came across SubGit (http://subgit.com/). This tool looks > >> like it potentially fill the gap seamlessly. I'll have to look further > >> into it, but it does seem promising. > >> > >> I'll look into it, and revise my vote. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Jim > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Hiram Chirino <[email protected] > >wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Jim, > >>> > >>> Git has a similar feature called submodules. See: > >>> http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Submodules > >>> > >>> But honestly it should not be to much trouble to just script a few git > >>> checkouts in your build process would it? > >>> > >>> I find SVN to be too slow for everyday use. Being able to be able to > >>> fully use all the SCM features even when offline is also a very bonus. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jim Gomes <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > -1 > >>> > > >>> > We integrate the ActiveMQ NMS build tree into our build process using > >>> > external references. Switching to Git will most likely make this > >>> > impossible. If there is a solution that can continue to make this > >>> seamless > >>> > for us, then I could consider changing my vote. > >>> > > >>> > I would also ask what are the advantages? I see this as something > that > >>> > isn't broken and doesn't need fixing. Merging between branches with > >>> SVN is > >>> > extremely easy, and I do it all the time. I don't understand why > others > >>> > complain about it. The speed for checkouts, updates and commits is > >>> > excellent. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Willem jiang <[email protected] > > > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> +1 and it saves you lots of time if you need to merge between the > >>> branches. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> -- > >>> >> Willem Jiang > >>> >> > >>> >> Red Hat, Inc. > >>> >> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > >>> >> Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com > >>> >> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com ( > >>> http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) > >>> >> (English) > >>> >> http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese) > >>> >> Twitter: willemjiang > >>> >> Weibo: 姜宁willem > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> On Friday, June 7, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> > Seems some other projects at the ASF have been switching from SVN > to > >>> >> > Git. How you guys feel about making the switch too? I know > >>> >> > personally I much prefer using Git to SVN and my main development > >>> >> > model has been using SVN via Git. Just want to take a poll to see > if > >>> >> > any of the ActiveMQ developers would have strong objections to > moving > >>> >> > to Git. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > -- > >>> >> > Hiram Chirino > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) | fusesource.com( > >>> >> http://fusesource.com) | redhat.com (http://redhat.com) > >>> >> > > >>> >> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino > >>> >> > > >>> >> > blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Hiram Chirino > >>> > >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. > >>> > >>> [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com > >>> > >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino > >>> > >>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo > >>> > >> > >> > > > > -- > Hiram Chirino > > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. > > [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com > > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino > > blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo >
