If you internet connection is not good, merging the patch between the branch by using SVN could take more than 10 minutes. I really hate that, even with help of git-svn, I can do some work off line , but it is still pain in ass to merge the patch for trunk to other branches and committed them into svn repository.
-- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Saturday, June 8, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Jim Gomes wrote: > -1 > > We integrate the ActiveMQ NMS build tree into our build process using > external references. Switching to Git will most likely make this > impossible. If there is a solution that can continue to make this seamless > for us, then I could consider changing my vote. > > I would also ask what are the advantages? I see this as something that > isn't broken and doesn't need fixing. Merging between branches with SVN is > extremely easy, and I do it all the time. I don't understand why others > complain about it. The speed for checkouts, updates and commits is > excellent. > > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Willem jiang <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > +1 and it saves you lots of time if you need to merge between the branches. > > > > > > -- > > Willem Jiang > > > > Red Hat, Inc. > > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com > > Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) > > (English) > > http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese) > > Twitter: willemjiang > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, June 7, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > > > > > Seems some other projects at the ASF have been switching from SVN to > > > Git. How you guys feel about making the switch too? I know > > > personally I much prefer using Git to SVN and my main development > > > model has been using SVN via Git. Just want to take a poll to see if > > > any of the ActiveMQ developers would have strong objections to moving > > > to Git. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Hiram Chirino > > > > > > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. > > > > > > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) | fusesource.com > > > (http://fusesource.com) ( > > http://fusesource.com) | redhat.com (http://redhat.com) > > > > > > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino > > > > > > blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
