Cool could you switch your vote officially to +1 so we can close this thread out?
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Jim Gomes <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hiram, > > If that's possible, that would be great until I can confirm a final > solution. I'm sure there is one, and I'd hate to hold up a migration that > pretty much everyone else is in favor of. > > Best, > Jim > > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Jim, >> >> If your still feeling hesitant, how about we exclude the NMS bits from >> migrating to Git for now? Would that work for you? >> >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Jim Gomes <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Of particular importance to how we do things, I found the following Q&A >> > extremely helpful. In particular, this answer ( >> > http://stackoverflow.com/a/4120179/444653) to the following question: >> > >> > >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4120001/what-is-the-git-equivalent-for-revision-number >> > >> > Our build process automatically generates build numbers by extracting >> > revision numbers. This would be an important feature in order to >> > potentially use git directly. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Jim Gomes <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Hiram, >> >> >> >> While that particular tool wouldn't quite work for us, I did a little >> more >> >> digging, and came across SubGit (http://subgit.com/). This tool looks >> >> like it potentially fill the gap seamlessly. I'll have to look further >> >> into it, but it does seem promising. >> >> >> >> I'll look into it, and revise my vote. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jim >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Hiram Chirino <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi Jim, >> >>> >> >>> Git has a similar feature called submodules. See: >> >>> http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Submodules >> >>> >> >>> But honestly it should not be to much trouble to just script a few git >> >>> checkouts in your build process would it? >> >>> >> >>> I find SVN to be too slow for everyday use. Being able to be able to >> >>> fully use all the SCM features even when offline is also a very bonus. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jim Gomes <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > -1 >> >>> > >> >>> > We integrate the ActiveMQ NMS build tree into our build process using >> >>> > external references. Switching to Git will most likely make this >> >>> > impossible. If there is a solution that can continue to make this >> >>> seamless >> >>> > for us, then I could consider changing my vote. >> >>> > >> >>> > I would also ask what are the advantages? I see this as something >> that >> >>> > isn't broken and doesn't need fixing. Merging between branches with >> >>> SVN is >> >>> > extremely easy, and I do it all the time. I don't understand why >> others >> >>> > complain about it. The speed for checkouts, updates and commits is >> >>> > excellent. >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Willem jiang <[email protected] >> > >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> >> +1 and it saves you lots of time if you need to merge between the >> >>> branches. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> -- >> >>> >> Willem Jiang >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Red Hat, Inc. >> >>> >> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat >> >>> >> Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com >> >>> >> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com ( >> >>> http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) >> >>> >> (English) >> >>> >> http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese) >> >>> >> Twitter: willemjiang >> >>> >> Weibo: 姜宁willem >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Friday, June 7, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Seems some other projects at the ASF have been switching from SVN >> to >> >>> >> > Git. How you guys feel about making the switch too? I know >> >>> >> > personally I much prefer using Git to SVN and my main development >> >>> >> > model has been using SVN via Git. Just want to take a poll to see >> if >> >>> >> > any of the ActiveMQ developers would have strong objections to >> moving >> >>> >> > to Git. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > -- >> >>> >> > Hiram Chirino >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) | fusesource.com( >> >>> >> http://fusesource.com) | redhat.com (http://redhat.com) >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Hiram Chirino >> >>> >> >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. >> >>> >> >>> [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com >> >>> >> >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino >> >>> >> >>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Hiram Chirino >> >> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. >> >> [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com >> >> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino >> >> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo >> -- Hiram Chirino Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
