My vote isn't binding anyway. You guys can (and apparently will) do whatever you want, since you control the PMC. I was adding my vote "for the record." You guys trying to hamstring the main distribution of AMQ so that you can push your console is really uncool and goes against the spirit of what the ASF is all about.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:56 PM, James Carman > <[email protected]> wrote: >> -1, activemq needs to have a console bundled with it and it needs to >> be part of the default distribution. >> > > This is not a valid reason for -1. The vote has NOTHING to do about > the distribution. > Only about creating a new sub project for the web console project to live. > > > >> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Since there seems to be general agreement that the web-console should >>> be moved to a sub-project, lets put it to a vote and make it official. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Create the activemq-web-console sub-project with the associated >>> git, wiki, and jira spaces. >>> [ ] -1 Veto the making it a sub-project >>> >>> -- >>> Hiram Chirino >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. >>> [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino >>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > Red Hat, Inc. > Email: [email protected] > Twitter: davsclaus > Blog: http://davsclaus.com > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen > Make your Camel applications look hawt, try: http://hawt.io
