Oops, didn't realize that some of the parties are actually not on
private@. Maybe in private then.
Hadrian
On 01/30/2014 11:11 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Rob, please stop stretching the truth. I would strongly encourage you
guys if you really want to continue the discussion on this tone to do
it on private@.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 01/30/2014 03:10 AM, Robert Davies wrote:
Hi Johan,
its great to know that you are earning so much money from Apache
ActiveMQ!
I want the best experience for the end user of ActiveMQ - and
that’s it - simple. Right now that’s hawtio. The old web console is
frankly well beyond love - but I can understand from a money making
point of view you wouldn’t want to have hawtio as an option of end
users. Which is why moving it to a sub-project will allow you and
your colleagues to work on it - you’ll probably get even more money
from your customers - or you could just save the hard work - skin
hawtio however you like (Johan’s Console) - and make a mint yay!
What ever happens in the community, what ever console we use, if
nobody uses hawtio ever again, if folks went bananas and started
using other OS solutions - I and my “Fuse” (top 10 on [1]).
colleagues get payed the same. We don’t have an interest in this for
financial gain, let alone agree on what should happen - apart from
the old web console is something we don’t want to work on - but when
you’ve been fixing crappy bugs in for a while [1] - you may feel the
same way.
When you get a salary/bonus/shares regardless - it enables you to
make decisions that’s best for the users - I don’t think that anyone
else (your colleagues or partner companies) who want so desperately
to keep the old console, have the same objectivity.
Just so its all out there - hawtio is open source, is AS2 licence -
and the community is diverse. More than one large company uses it
directly in their products. Where hawtio lives, what direction it
takes is entirely down to the hawtio community - my employer - Red
Hat really doesn’t care - hawtio isn’t at the ASF for other reasons.
[1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/activemq/contributors?query=&sort=commits
On 30 Jan 2014, at 05:41, Johan Edstrom <[email protected]> wrote:
A big -1 that is non binding.
I'm tired of this shit, let us put it all on the table.
I probably made around 75k USD last year supporting and writing code
around AMQ.
If you count the other work I probably made closer to 300k USD, so
yes I'm really open.
I'm working with or I am surrounded by the people that benefit from
what AMQ does.
So I'll go on and list the rest of the people here - Just from the
last post.
Dejan, +1 - RedHat
Hiram, +1 - RedHat
Rob +1 - RedHat,
Claus +1 RedHat,
I could go on, I could also put their purchase history from Fuse to
RedHat,
inspect AS Server Modules and SwitchYard.
Then I could ask if there was a monetary gain in Hawt (WTF?) is
introduced into
Jiras, emails, mailing lists or whatever the hell else?
So - we have a PMC telling us that not using ASF code but rather RH
code is good
- since it is Secure,
- since it isn't the 90's
- since it is what the customer wants?
Does anyone actually believe this load of shit?
On Jan 29, 2014, at 12:14 PM, Kevin Earls <[email protected]> wrote:
+1
On Jan 29, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[email protected]>
wrote:
+1
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
[email protected]
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:01 AM, James Strachan
<[email protected]>wrote:
+1
On 28 January 2014 15:18, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]>
wrote:
Since there seems to be general agreement that the web-console
should
be moved to a sub-project, lets put it to a vote and make it
official.
[ ] +1 Create the activemq-web-console sub-project with the
associated
git, wiki, and jira spaces.
[ ] -1 Veto the making it a sub-project
--
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
[email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
--
James
-------
Red Hat
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: jstrachan, fusenews
Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
Rob Davies
————————
Red Hat, Inc
http://hawt.io - #dontcha
Twitter: rajdavies
Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/