Oops, didn't realize that some of the parties are actually not on private@. Maybe in private then.

Hadrian


On 01/30/2014 11:11 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Rob, please stop stretching the truth. I would strongly encourage you guys if you really want to continue the discussion on this tone to do it on private@.

Cheers,
Hadrian


On 01/30/2014 03:10 AM, Robert Davies wrote:
Hi Johan,

its great to know that you are earning so much money from Apache ActiveMQ!

I want the best experience for the end user of ActiveMQ - and that’s it - simple. Right now that’s hawtio. The old web console is frankly well beyond love - but I can understand from a money making point of view you wouldn’t want to have hawtio as an option of end users. Which is why moving it to a sub-project will allow you and your colleagues to work on it - you’ll probably get even more money from your customers - or you could just save the hard work - skin hawtio however you like (Johan’s Console) - and make a mint yay!

What ever happens in the community, what ever console we use, if nobody uses hawtio ever again, if folks went bananas and started using other OS solutions - I and my “Fuse” (top 10 on [1]). colleagues get payed the same. We don’t have an interest in this for financial gain, let alone agree on what should happen - apart from the old web console is something we don’t want to work on - but when you’ve been fixing crappy bugs in for a while [1] - you may feel the same way.

When you get a salary/bonus/shares regardless - it enables you to make decisions that’s best for the users - I don’t think that anyone else (your colleagues or partner companies) who want so desperately to keep the old console, have the same objectivity.


Just so its all out there - hawtio is open source, is AS2 licence - and the community is diverse. More than one large company uses it directly in their products. Where hawtio lives, what direction it takes is entirely down to the hawtio community - my employer - Red Hat really doesn’t care - hawtio isn’t at the ASF for other reasons.


[1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/activemq/contributors?query=&sort=commits


On 30 Jan 2014, at 05:41, Johan Edstrom <[email protected]> wrote:

A big -1 that is non binding.

I'm tired of this shit, let us put it all on the table.
I probably made around 75k USD last year supporting and writing code around AMQ. If you count the other work I probably made closer to 300k USD, so yes I'm really open.

I'm working with or I am surrounded by the people that benefit from what AMQ does.

So I'll go on and list the rest of the people here - Just from the last post.

Dejan, +1 - RedHat
Hiram, +1 - RedHat
Rob +1 - RedHat,
Claus +1 RedHat,

I could go on, I could also put their purchase history from Fuse to RedHat,
inspect AS Server Modules and SwitchYard.
Then I could ask if there was a monetary gain in Hawt (WTF?) is introduced into
Jiras, emails, mailing lists or whatever the hell else?

So - we have a PMC telling us that not using ASF code but rather RH code is good
- since it is Secure,
- since it isn't the 90's
- since it is what the customer wants?

Does anyone actually believe this load of shit?



On Jan 29, 2014, at 12:14 PM, Kevin Earls <[email protected]> wrote:

+1

On Jan 29, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[email protected]> wrote:

+1

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
[email protected]
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/


On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:01 AM, James Strachan <[email protected]>wrote:

+1


On 28 January 2014 15:18, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]> wrote:

Since there seems to be general agreement that the web-console should be moved to a sub-project, lets put it to a vote and make it official.

[ ] +1 Create the activemq-web-console sub-project with the associated
git, wiki, and jira spaces.
[ ] -1 Veto the making it a sub-project

--
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
[email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo



--
James
-------
Red Hat

Email: [email protected]
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: jstrachan, fusenews
Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/

Open Source Integration

Rob Davies
————————
Red Hat, Inc
http://hawt.io - #dontcha
Twitter: rajdavies
Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/




Reply via email to