Rob, not sure what question you answered, but again, what were the
reasons to develop hawt.io outside the ASF that you alluded to?
Hadrian
On 01/30/2014 03:40 PM, Robert Davies wrote:
Red Hat employees thousands of open source developers, who in turn develop on
hundreds of projects. Developers are encouraged to go and explore new stuff.
New projects can form anywhere under loose guidelines (e.g. GitHub, Eclipse,
Apache, JBoss community are fine - its really is up to that community). Red Hat
is a pretty unique company, with a very unique open culture. They have one rule
for their products - they have to be completely open source. In that
environment, it would be surprising if developers weren’t encouraged to
innovate new things.
On 30 Jan 2014, at 18:53, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> wrote:
Since you made this claim, can you please explain what the reasons are?
Hopefully it will clarify the misunderstanding. Personally I find it very hard
to understand how a company that invests in something would not care what the
outcome is.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 01/30/2014 03:10 AM, Robert Davies wrote:
Where hawtio lives, what direction it takes is entirely down to the hawtio
community - my employer - Red Hat really doesn’t care - hawtio isn’t at the
ASF for other reasons.
[1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/activemq/contributors?query=&sort=commits
Rob Davies
————————
Red Hat, Inc
http://hawt.io - #dontcha
Twitter: rajdavies
Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
