On 30 Jan 2014, at 22:07, jgenender <[email protected]> wrote: > I am also interested in why not at Apache. Looking at the contributors list: > > https://github.com/hawtio/hawtio/graphs/contributors > > A lot of those names seem to jump out as being AMQ committers. I assume you > would know, or perhaps one of the other hawt.io contributors would like to > chime in?
There’s more committers there who aren’t involved with Apache, but really its their community - they can choose where their code lives. Apache isn’t exactly the best place for innovation. Just look at this whole thread, imagine trying to create a UI based around consensus - it wouldn’t happen - so it doesn’t seem odd to me that the ASF wouldn't be there first choice. > > Also, if you are not part of the hawt.io community, whats up with your > signature? There’s never been a great management console before that has been under a permissive licence like the ASF - its a game changer. I’m happy to promote in any small way I can. > > > rajdavies wrote >> I’m not a member of the hawtio community - but they were pretty clear they >> didn’t feel the ASF was the best place to innovate and develop a UI. >> <SNIP> >> Rob Davies >> ———————— >> Red Hat, Inc >> http://hawt.io - #dontcha >> Twitter: rajdavies >> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com >> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Move-the-ActiveMQ-web-console-to-a-sub-project-tp4676877p4677102.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies ———————— Red Hat, Inc http://hawt.io - #dontcha Twitter: rajdavies Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
