Yeah, I just want to hear folks chime in on whether they think this is the right way to go with the code. It definitely needs a "facelift", so that folks can get excited about working on it. What I have done with the "angularization" is to just set up Spring-MVC-based REST services to feed the UI. This wasn't too much of a jump away from what's there, since it already uses Spring. And, for the type of traffic the webconsole should expect, I think Spring-MVC is just fine. Other than that, the site is one main html file with a bunch of partials for the different screens.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Zakeria Hassan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > I agree with Hadrian, we want everyone's input. Lets keep it in the mailing > list because its easier to reference and get our community input. Anything > we can discuss on IRC can but done on this mailing list. > Totally want everyone's input and I want to work in an open transparent > way. So lets keep this conversation flowing and the ideas pouring. > > > Thanks, > Zak > @Prospect1010 > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:49 AM, James Carman > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Well, what I wanted to do was get a feeler for if there are any >> blockers here, before we start doing any work. Let's hear from the >> dev community a bit more before we go too far. I wouldn't want our >> work to be wasted if there were any objections. Anyone? >> >> As Hadrian said in another email, we should definitely try to discuss >> on-list as much as we can. There's nothing wrong with chatting about >> issues we're having and stuff on IRC, but any *decisions* need to be >> made on the mailing list. We have to be open to input from the entire >> community. >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Zakeria Hassan >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi James, >> > >> > We can definitely collaborate and make this web console a much better >> > experience for users. I usually get on IRC after work, it would be great >> to >> > chat with you. I know Angular.js so its great to have someone else that >> > knows it too. Are you online > 7:00pm (EST). Only one thing we need is >> > lots of issues created so in case people ask why. We can point to some >> > existing issues. Anyway we will chat on IRC and come up with a solid >> plan. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Zak >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:32 AM, James Carman >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> >> That's great, Zakeria! The Angular stuff isn't too hard. Looks like >> >> you've put together a pretty nice looking console. I'm not jazzed >> >> about merely doing an "upgrade" of the tech. I'd like to make the >> >> application work better, too. Although, I guess a good first draft >> >> would be to modernize the existing functionality and then worry about >> >> revamping things to be a bit more robust. WDYT? >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Zakeria Hassan >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi James, >> >> > >> >> > I've already updated the site to use bootstrap if you check out my >> repo: >> >> > >> >> > https://github.com/zmhassan/activemq.git >> >> > >> >> > If you want you can checkout screen shots on my blog: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> http://bzcareermongodb.blogspot.ca/2014/02/remedy-to-javaoutmemory-when-browsing.html >> >> > >> >> > All that is left is setting up Angular.js ... >> >> > >> >> > Lets tag team and drive some amazing upgrades to this console. If you >> >> want >> >> > to chat a bit about this via irc just email me. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > Zak >> >> > @Prospect1010 >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:12 AM, James Carman >> >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Does anyone have objections to modernizing the web console a bit, >> >> >> using AngularJS and Bootstrap? >> >> >> >> >> >>
