+1 for the project roadmap outlined by Dan.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can I break this down into 3 potential targets? We currently have users > asking about a possible 5.9.1 release to fix some serious issues there. In > addition, we have been talking about getting a 5.10 release out that has > some of the newer updates. > > My proposal would be: > > For 5.9.1 - console pretty much "as is" except the critical fixes. > Likely the URL encoding fixes and the OOM fixes. > > For 5.10.0 - include the other fixes such as the war size reductions and > dependency updates, etc.... Go through the various JIRA's that have patches > and look at them. Nothing earth shattering at this point as I wouldn't > want to hold up 5.10, but make sure users that have submitted patches and > such have their solutions incorporated to show the console is being updated. > > For 5.11 - I'm assuming this would be the target for this discussion. :-) > > For this, I'm certainly OK with flipping from the JSP based approach to, > well, anything. If you feel AngularJS/Bootstrap is the best way to go, > I'd certainly support that and be happy to learn a bit to help out. > > > At this point, however, I'm kind of concentrating on what I can do for the > 5.10.0 and 5.9.1 releases. I'd like to do whatever I can to get those out. > > > Dan > > > > > > On Feb 10, 2014, at 10:12 AM, James Carman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Does anyone have objections to modernizing the web console a bit, > > using AngularJS and Bootstrap? > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > >
