Speaking as a non-user of AMQ, I would say that if this fluent approach is easier to use than the existing way of configuring and starting a broker in java, then it should be added to AMQ.
thanks david jencks On Mar 13, 2015, at 4:13 PM, artnaseef <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm 50/50 on this. Like Hadrian said, it's nice syntax, but does it really > add value? I don't see anything there that cannot be done already via java > code - is that right? > > I think this is a good project to maintain, but not sure it should go into > ActiveMQ itself. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-DSLs-tp4693171p4693187.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
