IMHO it should be enough to just put these classes in the new package (something like org.apache.activemq.broker.dsl) inside the activemq-broker module.
Regards -- Dejan Bosanac ---------------------- Red Hat, Inc. [email protected] Twitter: @dejanb Blog: http://sensatic.net ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:26 AM, artnaseef <[email protected]> wrote: > That's an interesting use-case, and I see the value there. > > Would this be a new, separate artifact or a change to an existing one? > > Art > > P.S. apologies for confusion on my earlier post - using nabble's "raw" > content did indeed cause the content of the post to get stripped in email > somehow. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-DSLs-tp4693171p4693332.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
