I see "fluent is easier" as a valid argument to maintaining the project, but not necessarily as a reason to pull it into the ActiveMQ main code base.
Still, I am 50/50 on this myself. I personally don't have a need for simpler configuration of embedded brokers. Also, the syntax of fluent builders doesn't appeal to me personally, so that makes it harder for me to buy-in. For example: Seems simpler to understand than (I'm making this one up - not using the posted language): With that said - I acknowledge this is my opinion and welcome some discussion of the benefit of including the code inside of ActiveMQ itself (beyond the well-understood "it will then be maintained with the core code"). Art -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-DSLs-tp4693171p4693202.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
