Clebert, I'd suggest you don't go there.
I do not imply, I state (facts or opinions). I do not represent other
people's opinion, just my own. I am stating that Artemis is the
evolution of the HornetQ donation to the ASF by RH. ActiveMQ has
completely different origins.
As such, I was referring to other situations in the ASF's history (which
you my not be aware of) when 2 factions in the community could not agree
on the future of that one project. The result was some kind of fork.
That does not apply here, ActiveMQ 5 and Artemis are 2 different
projects. What facts are you disputing?
This discussion is about Artemis graduation that I believe would resolve
the current conundrum.
Stay on topic and cool down with the creative interpretations. Read
multiple times what has been written if necessary.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 12/06/2017 10:58 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> wrote:
What am I saying? There you have the authority in the field :).
John, the projects are in fact separated, Artemis is actually the donated
HornetQ project. It's not like 2 factions don't agree on the future of one
project.
You are implying your opinion here as everybody's. I would like to
listen everybody's opinion before you tell what is everybody's
opinion.
