On 12/7/17 5:28 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
I don't agree with the premise of this discussion at all. It seems to be
born out of a your replies to your self in an echo chamber.
Agree
What are the adverse consequences in providing a robust migration path for
5.x users to activemq 6 *within* the ActiveMQ project?
The preceding vote did not have an implicit "now" in the title, it was
future focused.
In hind sight the title could have been:
"When it's ready, Artemis becomes ActiveMQ 6"
I think there is consensus forming around that.
Agree. For those voting -1 on the "when its ready.." let's be
constructive. Provide path forward.
-Matt
