I don't agree with the premise of this discussion at all. It seems to be born out of a your replies to your self in an echo chamber.
What are the adverse consequences in providing a robust migration path for 5.x users to activemq 6 *within* the ActiveMQ project? The preceding vote did not have an implicit "now" in the title, it was future focused. In hind sight the title could have been: "When it's ready, Artemis becomes ActiveMQ 6" I think there is consensus forming around that. On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 at 02:05 Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Since Artemis has a kernel of developers had a few releases, and > hard-core Artemis believers want to be in control of their own destiny > and they believe the project can be sustained on its own merits and have > it's own awesome site, I propose that Artemis form its own PMC and start > a vote to graduate as TLP. > > Thoughts? > Hadrian > > >
