+1

Il giorno gio 14 gen 2021 alle ore 21:03 Havret <h4v...@gmail.com> ha
scritto:

> Finally!
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:52 PM Francesco Nigro <nigro....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 !!
> >
> > Il giorno gio 14 gen 2021 alle ore 20:33 Christopher Shannon <
> > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >
> > > +1 from me, JDK 11 has been around a couple years now so I think it's
> > fine.
> > >
> > > It would be nice to be able to use some of the new language features in
> > the
> > > broker.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 2:28 PM Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 1/12/21 11:35 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> > > > > I would like to propose requiring JDK 11 as a minimal requirement
> on
> > > > > ActiveMQ Artemis on master, to be released as 2.17
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > JDK 8 is about end of life, and that would open up better
> > > > > possibilities on what we write in Artemis. JDK 8 is pretty old at
> > this
> > > > > point and we need to move on.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone would object?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Tim Bish
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to