This would make clients have to upgrade to java 11 as well or switch to
something other than the artemis core client correct?
Ryan Yeats
On 1/15/21, 12:50 PM, "Emmanuel Hugonnet" <ehugo...@redhat.com> wrote:
While I would love to say yes (given I started to move the build to JDK11),
i have a concern about this move coming soon.
I'd love to have a JakartaEE 9 compatible client but that requires JDK8, so
2.17 might be a little too soon.
I have some preliminary work on this and plan to be working on it to have
something ready as soon as possible.
Cheers,
Emmanuel
Le 15/01/2021 à 10:41, Domenico Francesco Bruscino a écrit :
> +1
>
> Il giorno gio 14 gen 2021 alle ore 21:03 Havret <h4v...@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
>> Finally!
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:52 PM Francesco Nigro <nigro....@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 !!
>>>
>>> Il giorno gio 14 gen 2021 alle ore 20:33 Christopher Shannon <
>>> christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>>
>>>> +1 from me, JDK 11 has been around a couple years now so I think it's
>>> fine.
>>>> It would be nice to be able to use some of the new language features in
>>> the
>>>> broker.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 2:28 PM Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 1/12/21 11:35 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>>>>>> I would like to propose requiring JDK 11 as a minimal requirement
>> on
>>>>>> ActiveMQ Artemis on master, to be released as 2.17
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> JDK 8 is about end of life, and that would open up better
>>>>>> possibilities on what we write in Artemis. JDK 8 is pretty old at
>>> this
>>>>>> point and we need to move on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone would object?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Tim Bish
>>>>>
>>>>>
[Octo | Emerging Technology. Human Impact.]<https://www.octoconsulting.com/>
